<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Aware Writer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://awarewriter.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Conversations and tips about writing &#38; photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:49:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lovely Light, Shadow, Forms &amp; Textures by dragonstar01</title>
		<link>http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/2013/06/15/lovely-light-shadow-forms-textures/#comment-7984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dragonstar01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/?p=3573#comment-7984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Such wonderful textures and shapes, and the light is beautiful!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such wonderful textures and shapes, and the light is beautiful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Scan B&amp;W Negatives: VueScan (Intro) by hopeapaju</title>
		<link>http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/2012/01/11/how-to-scan-bw-negatives-vuescan-intro/#comment-7983</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hopeapaju]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/?p=3125#comment-7983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One more thing about the coarse grains I got. As with the 4800 dpi output resolution, I would expect the scan stand at least in the range of some digital image shot with a 18+ MP camera. But that does not seem to be the case when I compare it to my other digital images.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing about the coarse grains I got. As with the 4800 dpi output resolution, I would expect the scan stand at least in the range of some digital image shot with a 18+ MP camera. But that does not seem to be the case when I compare it to my other digital images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Scan B&amp;W Negatives: VueScan (Intro) by hopeapaju</title>
		<link>http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/2012/01/11/how-to-scan-bw-negatives-vuescan-intro/#comment-7982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hopeapaju]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/?p=3125#comment-7982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will try out the different DCI settings later on. 

The Plus-X was taken and developed years back. I dont remember Plus-X would have such coarse grains, even though I might have developed it with Rodinal, that is why I started to wonder. 

The output resolution was maximum at 4800 dpi. I hope I did not forget or misunderstand any scanning basics, though. Or could it also be I have been a bit too spoilt by digital photography and done too much pixel-peeping in Lightroom ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will try out the different DCI settings later on. </p>
<p>The Plus-X was taken and developed years back. I dont remember Plus-X would have such coarse grains, even though I might have developed it with Rodinal, that is why I started to wonder. </p>
<p>The output resolution was maximum at 4800 dpi. I hope I did not forget or misunderstand any scanning basics, though. Or could it also be I have been a bit too spoilt by digital photography and done too much pixel-peeping in Lightroom &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Scan B&amp;W Negatives: VueScan (Intro) by awarewriter</title>
		<link>http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/2012/01/11/how-to-scan-bw-negatives-vuescan-intro/#comment-7981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[awarewriter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/?p=3125#comment-7981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think the choice of film type affects the graininess of the scan. I use either Tmax-100 or Tmax-400. Play with the Developer Contrast Index while you have Graph b/w up on your screen. Different DCI settings will yield different histograms. Just find the best histogram for your neg and use that. Works like a charm.

Grain? I haven&#039;t used Plus-X in many years. You might try experimenting with different scan resolutions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the choice of film type affects the graininess of the scan. I use either Tmax-100 or Tmax-400. Play with the Developer Contrast Index while you have Graph b/w up on your screen. Different DCI settings will yield different histograms. Just find the best histogram for your neg and use that. Works like a charm.</p>
<p>Grain? I haven&#8217;t used Plus-X in many years. You might try experimenting with different scan resolutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Scan B&amp;W Negatives: VueScan (Intro) by hopeapaju</title>
		<link>http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/2012/01/11/how-to-scan-bw-negatives-vuescan-intro/#comment-7980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hopeapaju]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/?p=3125#comment-7980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From your experience, in Vuescan how much do the &quot;B/W Vendor&quot; and &quot;B/W Brand&quot; affect the graininess of the scan result? 
I was trying to scan some negatives, Kodak Plus-X 125, but could not find that in the list. I tried once with &quot;Generic&quot; and once with &quot;TMAX 400 Professional&quot;. Both scan results seem rather a little bit too grainy. 

Can the &quot;Type = D76 CI&quot; value be used to control to level of grain?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From your experience, in Vuescan how much do the &#8220;B/W Vendor&#8221; and &#8220;B/W Brand&#8221; affect the graininess of the scan result?<br />
I was trying to scan some negatives, Kodak Plus-X 125, but could not find that in the list. I tried once with &#8220;Generic&#8221; and once with &#8220;TMAX 400 Professional&#8221;. Both scan results seem rather a little bit too grainy. </p>
<p>Can the &#8220;Type = D76 CI&#8221; value be used to control to level of grain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lovely Light, Shadow, Forms &amp; Textures by Valentine Logar</title>
		<link>http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/2013/06/15/lovely-light-shadow-forms-textures/#comment-7979</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Valentine Logar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/?p=3573#comment-7979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Motivation is sometimes very difficult, I think though the call of outdoors and more wonderful shots like this might do it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Motivation is sometimes very difficult, I think though the call of outdoors and more wonderful shots like this might do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lovely Light, Shadow, Forms &amp; Textures by Wayne Woodruff</title>
		<link>http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/2013/06/15/lovely-light-shadow-forms-textures/#comment-7977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wayne Woodruff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 01:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/?p=3573#comment-7977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slow and steady!  

Great textures in the bark and I like the roots reaching out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slow and steady!  </p>
<p>Great textures in the bark and I like the roots reaching out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lovely Light, Shadow, Forms &amp; Textures by Red</title>
		<link>http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/2013/06/15/lovely-light-shadow-forms-textures/#comment-7976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Red]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 03:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/?p=3573#comment-7976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And Happy Father&#039;s Day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Happy Father&#8217;s Day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lovely Light, Shadow, Forms &amp; Textures by Red</title>
		<link>http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/2013/06/15/lovely-light-shadow-forms-textures/#comment-7975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Red]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 03:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/?p=3573#comment-7975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I looks like the tree is raising its eyebrow at you. Glad to hear the outside is calling to you. Motivation to move oneself in a direction beyond the couch. Great shot, John.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looks like the tree is raising its eyebrow at you. Glad to hear the outside is calling to you. Motivation to move oneself in a direction beyond the couch. Great shot, John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lovely Light, Shadow, Forms &amp; Textures by Steve</title>
		<link>http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/2013/06/15/lovely-light-shadow-forms-textures/#comment-7974</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 20:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awarewriter.wordpress.com/?p=3573#comment-7974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right. The shadows really make the photo interesting.

And keep on swinging! LOL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right. The shadows really make the photo interesting.</p>
<p>And keep on swinging! LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
