Most of the floating debris had gone and the water was clear — well, as clear as the Delaware River gets in our neck of the woods. I could see the bottom in the shallow water from the Red Bank Battlefield Park pier, so…
I took this photo looking almost straight down into the water. The reflections are subtle, the patterns abstract and the image is mostly mid tones. I have a polarizer that’s designed for use with color film (it incorporates a warming filter) so I’ve never tried it with B&W film.
I’ve been experimenting with my workflow. I did my editing with the Gimp instead of Picture Window Pro. I used smart sharpening with the refocus plug-in enabled and ended up with more texture (over sharpened?) than I would accept normally but I decided I liked the effect this time.
PS — The first few comments got me to thinking about the texture of the water so I decided to make another version of the image and post it…
I scanned this version as a 16 bit tiff file and did all my transformations with Picture Window Pro. This version is softer because I sharpened conservatively the way I usually do. The original histogram looks like the Washington monument — lots of mid tones but very little shadow or highlight. I did a modest local contrast enhancement, then I pulled the curve down a little to darken the image. I tweaked the curve again with a small contrast adjustment to the midtones. Finally I used USM at 50%, radius = 1 and threshold =2. That’s all. I converted the image to 8 bit, added my watermark with the Gimp and saved the file as a jpeg.
The texture is still there but much softer. I think the texture was in the water itself or under the surface, probably the latter. If I remember correctly, the river bottom was covered with vegetation. I think this second image is an improvement. The sharpening in the first was a bit over the top and not what I usually do. It gave the image a roughness that suggests a drawing rather than a photo. Which is the better? I like both.